1、😀《索拉里斯♕》讲述的是什么故事？
秋霞电影网网友： 《索拉里斯》这是一部没有刻意的煽情，全是真实、走心的诠释的电影，
我看错版本了TAT（索拉里斯）影评
起因是看《犯罪心理》时，ride邀请emily看苏联加长版的《Solaris》，我这就来了兴趣！！网上down下来看，却开始产生疑问，我看的这个版本，跟ride说的那个可能不是同一回事=A=
看完后上网再一查，真的找错版本了，ride说的那个是1972年导演安德列·塔科夫斯基拍的呐，我摔=A=
但看也看了，还是记个小记，以后补回1972年版好了。
02年这个版本的故事，开玩笑的说那是大家都掉进藏马的幻觉植物里了XD。Solaris这个星球，有股诡异的能量，他貌似有生命、有意识的迷惑接近她的人类。派去调查停留在Solaris附近太空站真相的科学家Dr.凯文在揭开事情真相的最后选择迷失在Solaris制造的假象中，与重生的妻子迈向“幸福”的生活。
电影中登场的人物很少，主要场景就只有五个人，最后唯一回到现实的只剩下黑人女科学家海伦、他从头到尾都很坚定的认为，大家遇到记忆中的实体造访者都是因为Solaris这个星球在干扰、影响了人们的大脑。
看到这里也就明白为什么编剧会让ride提起这部戏，几乎都是心理、潜意识、精神问题相关的SF剧，虽然这次看的版本不对，但也正好预习了一下剧情大概，苏联导演都有拍电影很晦涩的前科，预习过后，应该能很好的衔接72年版的电影。好期待！
片中关于凯文已经去世的妻子蕾亚重生这段，反而让人想探讨克隆人是新生命体还是承接原主意识的替代者这样的问题，就片中的描述，他妻子是Solaris根据凯文的记忆衍生出的生命体，海伦也能看到他说明蕾亚确实已经是个生命实体，尽管出自于Solaris星的一块肉，他死不了，但蕾亚确实是有独立意识的生命体。原本推论或许大家都被Solaris星影响了大脑，把眼前的幻觉看成了实体，但海伦制造的能量源能彻底清除来访者，那就直接否定了这个推导。
有个小细节，一开始凯文博士在所谓的现实中自己的家里切水果时，不小心切到自己的手，那伤口口子，非常的大，还大的有点假，反倒是后来掉落Solaris星外围一瞬间的幻觉中，回到过去蕾亚还在的场景里那伤口口子变真实了，导演又想把解读的钥匙交给影迷发散思考开去了吗？！我再摔！！！太嫩了啦！！想超越晦涩的苏联导演乃太嫩了啦！！！！
◆ 片 名：飞向太空 / 索拉力星
◆ 制 片：詹姆斯·卡梅隆（James Cameron）
◆ 导 演：史蒂文·索德伯格（Steven Soderbergh）
◆ 编 剧：史蒂文·索德伯格（Steven Soderbergh）
◆ 主 演：乔治·克鲁尼George Clooney
娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩Natascha McElhone
杰瑞米·戴维斯Jeremy Davies
维奥拉·戴维斯Viola Davis
乌尔里希·图科Ulrich Tukur
◆ 类 型：奇幻（Fantasy）惊悚（Thriller）
◆ 国家地区：USA
◆ 语 言：English
◆ 发行公司：福克斯（20th Century Fox）
◆ 制作公司：USA影业（USA Films）
◆ 首映日期：2002年11月27日
◆ 片 长：99分钟
幕后：
本片改编自著名波兰科幻小说作家斯坦尼斯洛·兰姆的同名科幻小说，而早在1972年，大名鼎鼎的塔可夫斯基就已经把它搬上了银幕。小说本身已经充满了对生命的思考，老塔的版本更是充满了内省和对灵魂的诘问。该版本诗意盎然，有个场景，男女主人公因失重而漂浮，仿佛夏加尔的画中人似，半空飞舞，堪称影史经典。
起初导演索德伯格对拍摄这部科幻影片并不太感兴趣，因为他从来没有拍摄过类似的题材，而且他对表现未来的科技也兴趣索然。可是当他回忆起曾经看过的小说与电影时，他答应了20世纪福克斯公司的拍摄邀请。而詹姆斯·卡梅隆和雷·桑奇尼，还有扬·兰道所在的光风暴公司 (Lightstorm Entertainment)则花了五年的时间与俄罗斯方面交涉，解决版权等等问题。对卡梅隆来说，拍摄《飞向太空》几乎是个梦幻般的计划，他认为小说的故事全都发生在回忆与想像中，因而可以有无限开放的表现空间。索德伯格答应拍摄的消息让他大为激动。于是我们看到的是明星制作班底：以《泰坦尼克》获奥斯卡奖的卡梅隆，和以《毒品网络》获奥斯卡奖的索德伯格。
与库布里克和斯皮尔伯格不同，索德伯格在拍摄中并未强烈突出未来的高科技，而是更多集中在故事和人物的发掘上。然而科幻影片的硬件依然是重要的，影片的制作设计莫西纳曾经与索德伯格在《11罗汉》、《永不妥协》等多部影片中合作，这次他给影片设计了压抑的内部空间。光线的设计也与情节密切相关：“我们想让‘普罗米修斯’号既真实可感，又如梦似幻。”
索德伯格拍摄的电影题材越来越多变了，从现实主义的《性、谎言和录像带》，到惊悚的《卡夫卡》、惊险不失幽默的《至激关系》，一直到情节复杂、人物众多的《毒品网络》、《11罗汉》，他正如卡梅隆所说，如同变色龙一般灵活。
[演员]
心理学家，离家若乾光年，面对死而复生的妻子和其他光怪陆离的事件，这样的角色绝对难以驾驭。索德伯格想到的第一个人选就是与他合作过《至激关系》和《11罗汉》的乔治·克鲁尼，而后者也欣于从命，并且非常珍视这个机会。但是看上去无论如何没有知识分子相的克鲁尼，要使自己的角色让人信服，想来并非易事。
在片中扮演妻子蕾亚的英国演员娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩，曾经出演了《楚门的世界》、《拯救毕加索》、《浪人》等等影片。索德伯格对她评价甚高：“她让我想起了60、70年代法国那些极其优秀的女演员，比如让娜·莫罗，和多米尼克·桑德。她们是机智、性感、复杂的女人，不是姑娘，而是女人。”也许期待她的演出，比期待克鲁尼的心理学家更有些道理？
影片只有五个角色，其中扮演举止古怪的年轻科学家斯诺的是杰瑞米·戴维斯。这个角色在索德伯格的设想中，需要与其他的人有强有力的互动，他的表演要有种怪异的能量，显出特殊的张力。杰瑞米·戴维斯？对，就是《百万美元酒店》里那个可爱的难以置信的TomTom，《拯救大兵瑞恩》里也有他。这个人曾经因为在大卫·罗素(David O. Russell)的影片《打猴子》(Spanking The Monkeys)里的表演获得过独立精神奖的最佳新人。
第四个角色是女科学家海伦，意志坚强，由和索德伯格合作过两次的维奥拉·戴维斯扮演。那个开始就死去的吉巴里安则由德国演员乌尔里希·图科扮演，他在德国是家喻户晓的明星。吉巴里安舱里的录像带，后来揭露了一切的真相。
[闲言碎语]
有塔可夫斯基的珠玉在前，要说对索德伯格版的《飞向太空》拭目以待，似乎有点虚伪。尤其最近以来，他的《11罗汉》和后来似乎要回到《性、谎言和录像带》那样的独立精神之作《正面全裸》风评都不甚佳。只能说《飞向太空》让人捏了把汗，担心会是又一部好莱坞风格的惊悚科幻片
记于2011-03-26 14:13
不错的“科幻”（索拉里斯）影评
本以为是72年的塔可夫斯基版，结果片子一开始，克鲁尼出来，看看他的年纪就知道这是个新版的
于是将就着先看了2002年的这个索德伯格版
应该说没有让我失望吧，很安静的片子，很美的画面，很动听的配乐，行云流水，却让人有种时间静止下来的感觉，看完了觉得有点恍惚
翻看了很多评论，有人大骂烂片，有人吹捧得天花乱坠的，正如IMDB上一句评论：
It's certainly not a film for everybody...
也看到原著作者的一个评论，说索德博格拍的不是他小说里想写的，至少他写的绝不是简单的Love in the outer space...哈哈，觉得挺搞笑的
不过觉得索导驾驭情节的能力还是挺强的，毕竟商业化的电影，把一本很小众的小说拍成这样挺不错了。Stanislaw Lem的评论也许更有用（索拉里斯）影评
The Solaris Station
After the premiere of this remake of the Tarkovski movie I read a number of critical reviews, which appeared in American press. The divergence of opinions and interpretations was enormous. The Americans in a somewhat childish manner"grade" films just like children's papers in school. Hence there were critics who gave Soderbergh's Solaris an"A", the majority agreed on a"B" and some gave it a"C".
Some reviewers, like the one from the"New York Times", claim the film was a"love story" - a romance set in outer space. I have not seen the film and I am not familiar with the script, hence I cannot say anything about the movie itself except for what the reviews reflect, albeit unclearly - like a distorted picture of one's face in ripply water. However, to my best knowledge, the book was not dedicated to erotic problems of people in outer space...
I cannot say anything reasonable about its creation - the book somehow"poured out of me" without any previous planning and I even had difficulties with the ending. However since I wrote it over forty years ago, from today's perspective I perceive it in a much more objective and rational way. I am also capable of finding analogies to other works, located in high regions of the world literature. Melville's"Moby Dick" could serve as an example; on the surface the book describes the history of a whaling ship and Capitan Ahab's pernicious quest for the white whale. Initially the critics destroyed the novel as meaningless and unsuccessful - after all why care about some whale the captain most likely would have converted into a number of cutlets and barrels full of animal fat? Only after great analytical efforts the critics discovered that the message of"Moby Dick" was neither animal fat nor even harpoons. Since much deeper, symbolic layers were found, in libraries Melville's work was removed from the"Adventures at Sea" section and placed elsewhere.
Had Solaris dealt with love of a man for a woman - no matter whether on Earth on in Space - it would not have been entitled Solaris! Istvan Csicsery-Ronay, an Americanized Hungarian specializing in literary studies called his analysis"The Book is the Alien". Indeed, in Solaris I attempted to present the problem of an encounter in Space with a form of being that is neither human nor humanoid.
Science fiction almost always assumed the aliens we meet play some kind of game with us the rules of which we sooner or later may understand (in most cases the"game" was the strategy of warfare). However I wanted to cut all threads leading to the personification of the Creature, i.e. the Solarian Ocean, so that the contact could not follow the human, interpersonal pattern - although it did take place in some strange manner. The method I used in the novel to demonstrate this was the particular outcome of the interest of people, who for over one hundred years have been studying the planet Solaris and the ocean covering its surface.
One should not speak of a"thinking" or a"non-thinking" Ocean, however the Ocean certainly was active, undertook some voluntary actions and was capable of doing things which were entirely alien to the human domain. Eventually, when it got the attention of little ants that struggled above its surface, it did so in a radical way. It penetrated the superficial established manners, conventions and methods of linguistic communication, and entered, in its own way, into minds of the people of the Solaris Station and revealed what was deeply hidden in each of them: a reprehensible guilt, a tragic event from the past suppressed by the memory, a secret and shameful desire. In some cases the reader remains unaware of what has been revealed; what we know is that in each case it was capable of incarnation and physical creation of a being the hidden secret was connected to. Ocean's actions lead one of the scientists to an emotional distress that ended in a suicide, others isolated themselves. When Kris Kelvin initially arrived at the Station he was unable to understand what was going on: all were hiding and in the corridor he encountered one of the phantoms - a giant Black woman in a reed skirt with whom the suicide Gibarian presumably had been conflicted.
Kelvin's recklessness and imprudent behavior in the past had not prevented the suicide of his beloved woman Harey. He buried her on Earth and in a sense he buried her in his mind as well - until the Ocean made her come back at the Solaris Station.
The Ocean appears quite stubborn in his ways: the creatures, a kind of remorse of the Station's scientists, cannot be gotten rid of - even those sent into space come back... Kelvin initially tried to kill Harey; later he accepted her presence and tried to play the role he had to abandon on Earth - of her beloved man.
The vision of the Planet Solaris was very important for me. Why was it important? The Solarian globe was not just any sphere surrounded by some jelly - it was an active being (although a non-human one). It neither built nor created anything translatable into our language that could have been"explained in translation". Hence a description had to be replaced by analysis - (obviously an impossible task) - of the internal workings of the Ocean's ego. This gave rise to symetriads, asymetriads and mimoids - strange semi-constructions scientists were unable to understand; they could only describe them in a mathematically meticulous manner, and this was the sole purpose of the growing Solarian library - the result of over a hundred years' efforts to enclose in folios what was not human and beyond human comprehension; what could not have been translated into human language - or into anything else.
One of the reviewers admitted he would prefer to see Tarkovski's Solaris one more time. Others speculated that while the producer won't make a lot of money and there will be no crowd at the box office, the film belongs to the genre of a more ambitious science fiction - since no one got murdered and neither star wars, nor space-werewolfs nor Schwarzenegger's Terminators were present. In the US an atmosphere filled with very concrete expectations usually accompanies the release of every new film. I found it interesting that although my book is quite old - almost half a century means a lot in present times - someone wanted to take the risk despite the fact that the plot did not meet the abovementioned expectations. (Along the way he might have gotten scared a bit, but the latter is a pure speculation on my part.)
The book ends in a romantic?tragic way; the girl herself wished to be annihilated, not wanting to be an instrument with the help of which the one she truly loves is being studied by some unknown power. Her annihilation takes place unbeknownst to Kelvin - with the help of one of Space Stations' residents. The Soderbergh movie supposedly has a different, more optimistic finale. If this were the case this would signify a concession to the stereotypes of American thinking regarding science fiction. It seems that these deep, concrete ruts of thinking cannot be avoided: either there is a happy ending or a space catastrophe. This may have been the reason for the touch of disappointment in some of the critics' reviews - they expected the girl created by the ocean to turn into a fury, a witch or a sorceress who would devour the main character, while worms and other filth would crawl out of her intestines.
Solaris was submitted to the next year's Berlin film festival and in Poland the film will be shown only after the festival is over. Polish distributors obtained a copy of the movie, however I am not that eager to see it.
The information that Soderbergh started filming my novel (although no one knew what the film would be like) crated an increase in publishers' interest from different countries. In Germany Bertelsmann took over Solaris, while the Danes, Norwegians, Koreans and an Arabic publishing house (from Syria) - also expressed interest in that title. Publishers also enquire about my other works. However all of this is only a side effect and has nothing to do with the novel itself.
Summing up, as Solaris' author I shall allow myself to repeat that I only wanted to create a vision of a human encounter with something that certainly exists, in a mighty manner perhaps, but cannot be reduced to human concepts, ideas or images. This is why the book was entitled Solaris and not Love in Outer Space.
Stanislaw Lem, December 8th, 2002主角是一个从来不是那种充满...✈ 2、😁这《索拉里斯♕》部剧中的台词，你怎么看？
神马电影网网友：最近《索拉里斯♕》😂上映了，没想到制作方非常地慷慨，一来就放全集，✌观众们可以一口气从第一集看到大结局。这部剧中演员们的高颜值是一大亮点之外，它里面的台词也非常的搞笑啊！台词沙雕中带着可爱。✊
3、😏《索拉里斯♕》😃有多少集？
被窝电影网友：私人影院。具体总集数可以去百度问答看看
4、😐《索拉里斯♕》😄2021年几月几日播出
青苹果影院网友：截止到2022，《索拉里斯♕》😅私人影院。
5、😑😆哪个网站可以免费看正版《索拉里斯♕》
艾玛影院网友：除了优酷视频视频软件之外你还可以去爱奇艺、芒果tv、西瓜影视-2022【实时更新】超热播电影电视剧[高清不卡]免费看-西瓜影视>百度视频等平台去看正版视频。
6、😒乔治·克鲁尼 娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩 维奥拉·戴维斯 的演技怎么样?"在《索拉里斯♕》这部剧中，你觉得乔治·克鲁尼 娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩 维奥拉·戴维斯 的演技怎么样?⚽
😇影视大全网友：最近有乔治·克鲁尼 娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩 维奥拉·戴维斯 等演员主演的私人影院一经播出就受到了很多观众的欢迎和认可，这部私人影院里面，✍演员的演技都是非常值得肯定的，我觉得乔治·克鲁尼 娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩 维奥拉·戴维斯 在里面的演技非常的好，他能够去把握这个角色所要表达的情感，向观众展现出更好的作品⚾
7、😓《索拉里斯♕》😈索拉里斯演员有哪些
人人影视网友：有以下演员主演：乔治·克鲁尼 娜塔莎·麦克艾霍恩 维奥拉·戴维斯 。
8、😘😉手机端软件app怎么免费看《索拉里斯♕》私人影院
秋秋影视网友：您可以用手机打开百度APP在搜索框里输入：索拉里斯♕手机在线观看免费，就可以找到免费正版播放资源了。手机免费看索拉里斯♕网址:https://www.evertop189.cn/evdetail/30655.html，这个网站免费无广告。
9、😙哪个软件可以看索拉里斯♕
小草影视网友：很多地方都可以看呀，我是在西瓜影视-2022【实时更新】超热播电影电视剧[高清不卡]免费看-西瓜影视上看的，打开APP后直接搜索“索拉里斯♕”就能看了。❤
10、😚《索拉里斯♕》😊评价怎么样？
豆瓣电影影评：我其实是想给索拉里斯😎颗星的，但是稍微回味了一会儿，觉得它不值，还是三星半吧。其实，我一向对香港私人影院非常宽容，甚至可以大言不惭的说，在国内和国际制作水平差距极大的情况下，我就是“双标”——都不在一个起跑线上，根本没法比呀。所以经常出现国外影片堪堪尚可，我却只给三星及格，香港私人影院只是稍微拍出了一点点好看，我就会给三星及以上，如果演员演技爆炸或者剧本极佳，我也不会吝啬我的5星，但是如果按照给国外影片打分的标准，这些香港私人影院可能通通都只能有三四颗星以下。🍚
丢豆网😍影评：剧情很流畅，人物也很丰满，节奏把握的很好，很有年代感。没有过多煽情，🍬每个人物都发挥了作用，细节也很到位。整个影片三观也很正，主演员们感情真挚，总体来说，可以和朋友一起看，推荐！！！
mtime时光网😋影评：第一次这么喜欢一部剧的女主角这个角色 聪明 独立 淡然 很有自己的主见 特别是略微带有的那一点狡黠 真是可爱极了！🍵
烂番茄影评：🎧男女主角真是清新可爱，看了之后，让我蠢蠢欲动，非常想早恋，可惜已过了早恋的年龄，o(╯□╰)o
